PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAX vs. XSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RAAX is traded in USD, while XSB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's -0.83% return.


RAAX

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
17.64%
6M
17.56%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*

XSB.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
0.52%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-0.85%
10Y*
1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
17.64%26.74%12.50%6.71%1.51%21.56%-8.27%6.14%-2.41%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
-0.83%8.66%-2.39%7.22%-9.76%-1.06%7.75%7.64%-4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and XSB.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAX vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAX
RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAAXXSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.04

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

0.28

+4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.90

0.67

+16.23

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAX and XSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and XSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAXXSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-28.27%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-3.40%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-7.05%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-17.85%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-8.46%

+4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-11.08%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.43%

+0.55%

Volatility

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 1.18%. This indicates that RAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAAXXSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

1.18%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

3.67%

+8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

4.74%

+9.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

6.84%

+8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

7.24%

+8.55%

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than XSB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAX vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than XSB.TO's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
1.99%2.34%1.91%3.66%1.53%8.72%6.27%2.37%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.10%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAAX and XSB.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.

RAAX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XSB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.10% for XSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAX and XSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer