RAAX vs. UCIB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB).
RAAX and UCIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RAAX is an actively managed fund by VanEck. It was launched on Apr 9, 2018. UCIB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015.
Performance
RAAX vs. UCIB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RAAX vs. UCIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 17.41% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 17.48% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 1.10% | 10.86% | -12.08% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RAAX having a 17.41% return and UCIB slightly higher at 17.48%.
RAAX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 37.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- —
UCIB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RAAX vs. UCIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than UCIB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RAAX vs. UCIB — Risk / Return Rank
RAAX
UCIB
RAAX vs. UCIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAAX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 1.08 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 1.50 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.16 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 6.17 | +10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAAX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.08 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.59 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.40 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAX and UCIB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RAAX vs. UCIB - Dividend Comparison
RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.99% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RAAX vs. UCIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum UCIB drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and UCIB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -36.94% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -11.17% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -20.95% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -0.86% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -9.11% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 3.91% | -1.62% |
Volatility
RAAX vs. UCIB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 4.55%, while ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RAAX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 5.11% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 15.71% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | 22.28% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 24.02% | -8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 21.62% | -5.76% |