RAAX vs. REMX
RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. RAAX is actively managed, while REMX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAAX returned 12.45%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for REMX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RAAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
RAAX vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 22.66% return.
RAAX
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 131.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
RAAX vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 11.48% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 22.66% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -43.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAX and REMX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between RAAX and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAX vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
RAAX
REMX
RAAX vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAAX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 5.68 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 14.86 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAAX vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -90.20% | +56.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -23.35% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -62.11% | +50.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -73.34% | +49.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -58.48% | +49.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -66.82% | +60.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 8.91% | -6.67% |
Volatility
RAAX vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 5.13%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 16.68%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAX | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 16.68% | -11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 37.37% | -24.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 50.00% | -35.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 40.71% | -25.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 37.15% | -21.35% |
RAAX vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAX vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than REMX's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 2.10% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.43% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAX and REMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to RAAX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 12.45% vs 3.96% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.43% for REMX.
RAAX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.59% for REMX.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAAX and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer