PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAX vs. NTSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAX vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly lower than NTSE's 32.02% return.


RAAX

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
19.15%
6M
19.65%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*

NTSE

1D
-1.17%
1M
11.32%
YTD
32.02%
6M
34.98%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAX vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
19.15%26.74%12.50%6.71%1.51%6.53%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
32.02%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and NTSE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.50

The correlation between RAAX and NTSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RAAX vs. NTSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAAX
NTSE

Energy

32.6%
0.1%

Industrials

28.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

17.4%
0.5%

Utilities

13.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.1%

Technology

1.7%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.2%
0.2%

Communication Services

0.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
2.1%

Energy

RAAX
32.6%
NTSE
0.1%

Industrials

RAAX
28.6%
NTSE
0.2%

Basic Materials

RAAX
17.4%
NTSE
0.5%

Utilities

RAAX
13.0%
NTSE
0.0%

Real Estate

RAAX
5.0%
NTSE
0.1%

Technology

RAAX
1.7%
NTSE
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RAAX
1.0%
NTSE
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

RAAX
0.5%
NTSE
0.3%

Healthcare

RAAX
0.2%
NTSE
0.2%

Communication Services

RAAX
0.1%
NTSE
1.8%

Financial Services

RAAX
0.0%
NTSE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAX vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAX
RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAX vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAAXNTSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.57

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

4.54

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.06

17.57

+3.50

RAAX vs. NTSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the NTSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAX and NTSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAAXNTSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

3.11

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.34

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.38

+0.23

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and NTSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAXNTSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-42.84%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-14.20%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-18.73%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-42.84%

+19.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.17%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-19.74%

+12.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

3.66%

-1.89%

Volatility

RAAX vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 2.95%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAAXNTSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

9.08%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

18.18%

-6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

20.73%

-7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

19.26%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

19.23%

-3.47%

RAAX vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAX vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than NTSE's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.51%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
1.96%2.34%1.91%3.66%1.53%8.72%6.27%2.37%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAAX and NTSE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to RAAX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs NTSE's -42.84%.

On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.54% vs 6.43% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.96% for RAAX.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.38% for NTSE.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAX and NTSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer