PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAA vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAA vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAA achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's 1.86% return.


RAAA

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAA vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RAAA
Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF
2.18%2.46%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAA and JBBB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAA vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAA

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAA vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAAA vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAAAJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.76

1.31

+2.45

Drawdowns

RAAA vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum JBBB drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAA and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAAJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-10.57%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-1.58%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

RAAA vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAAAJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

3.34%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.39%

5.26%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.39%

5.26%

-3.87%

RAAA vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAA vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

RAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than JBBB's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%
RAAA
Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF
4.79%2.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAAA and JBBB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RAAA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RAAA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 4.79% for RAAA.

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAAA and 0.49% for JBBB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAA and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer