R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE
R8T.DE (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) and XDRE.DE (Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both REIT funds. R8T.DE is actively managed, while XDRE.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, R8T.DE returned 6.12% vs 9.60% for XDRE.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. R8T.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XDRE.DE.
Performance
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R8T.DE achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than XDRE.DE's 7.27% return.
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDRE.DE
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.83% | -3.97% | -4.43% |
XDRE.DE Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 7.27% | -2.46% | -3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between R8T.DE and XDRE.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between R8T.DE and XDRE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
R8T.DE
XDRE.DE
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) and Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R8T.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 1.41 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 4.22 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R8T.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.86 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.04 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R8T.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.76%, roughly equal to the maximum XDRE.DE drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R8T.DE and XDRE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R8T.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.76% | -20.91% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.35% | -6.79% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.79% | -2.81% | -8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -8.22% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.72% | 2.27% | +8.45% |
Volatility
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) and Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R8T.DE | XDRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.92% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 8.43% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.56% | 11.17% | +13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 14.01% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 14.01% | +4.54% |
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
R8T.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDRE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
R8T.DE vs. XDRE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither R8T.DE nor XDRE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, R8T.DE and XDRE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDRE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for R8T.DE.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for R8T.DE and 0.18% for XDRE.DE.
Find the right allocation for R8T.DE and XDRE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer