PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
R2SC.L vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

R2SC.L is traded in GBP, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.04% annualized return.


R2SC.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.94%
YTD
16.67%
6M
16.08%
1Y
40.29%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
11.53%

^NDX

1D
-0.03%
1M
11.46%
YTD
21.52%
6M
18.76%
1Y
42.11%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
22.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
R2SC.L
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
16.67%4.66%11.86%12.18%-11.55%15.87%15.73%20.67%-7.45%4.45%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
21.52%11.61%27.06%46.12%-25.00%27.83%43.25%32.72%4.83%20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between R2SC.L and ^NDX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.42

The correlation between R2SC.L and ^NDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R2SC.L
R2SC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


R2SC.L^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.51

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

10.60

+3.08

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R2SC.L and ^NDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


R2SC.L^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.87

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.99

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.81

-0.27

Drawdowns

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, roughly equal to the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


R2SC.L^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-34.63%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-12.05%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.00%

-24.98%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.00%

-28.43%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-28.43%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.03%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-5.62%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.98%

-1.04%

Volatility

R2SC.L vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 4.01%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


R2SC.L^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.01%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

11.04%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

15.45%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

21.32%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

22.45%

-1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


R2SC.L and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for R2SC.L and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer