QYLG vs. SGRT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT).

QYLG and SGRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020.

Performance

QYLG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QYLG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-2.27%	10.09%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	9.56%	25.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 9.56% return.

QYLG

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -2.27%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 20.32%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

QYLG

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

SGRT

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

Return for Risk

QYLG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 68
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	2.09	-1.42

Correlation

The correlation between QYLG and SGRT is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QYLG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.82%, more than SGRT's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	18.82%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QYLG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.98%	-17.87%	-12.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	-7.09%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.60%	-3.52%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QYLG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	32.60%	-13.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	32.60%	-14.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	32.60%	-14.51%