QYLG vs. QEW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QYLG tracks the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index while QEW tracks the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.

Performance

QYLG vs. QEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QYLG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 6M: 14.78%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

QEW

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 10.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLG vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.04%
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLG and QEW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.88

Return for Risk

QYLG vs. QEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 81
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLG vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLG	QEW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.87	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLG	QEW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	9.75	-8.92

Drawdowns

QYLG vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and QEW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLG	QEW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.98%	-4.15%	-25.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.11%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-0.57%	-5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QYLG	QEW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	15.78%	-3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	15.78%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	15.78%	+2.15%

QYLG vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLG vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, while QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.08%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLG and QEW in my portfolio?

QYLG and QEW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QYLG or QEW?

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLG or QEW?

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLG or QEW?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.08%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.

What is the main difference between QYLG and QEW?

QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLG and 0.25% for QEW.