QYLG vs. AIQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLG returned 12.12%/yr vs 16.16%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.

Performance

QYLG vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 24.56% return.

QYLG

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 20.15%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

AIQ

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 6M: 23.60%
• 1Y: 51.28%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLG vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	12.38%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	13.88%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	24.56%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	20.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLG and AIQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020	0.89

The correlation between QYLG and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLG vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLG	AIQ
Technology	58.7%	77.4%
Communication Services	14.3%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	0.4%
Industrials	2.6%	3.4%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLG vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 71
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLG vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QYLG	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.94	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.44	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	3.13	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.22	10.06	+5.16

QYLG vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLG and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QYLG vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLG	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.98%	-44.66%	+14.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.42%	-16.47%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	-26.35%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-44.66%	+14.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-9.68%	+6.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-9.78%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	5.11%	-3.19%

Volatility

QYLG vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is 6.71%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 15.10%. This indicates that QYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLG	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	15.10%	-8.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.50%	22.68%	-11.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	26.54%	-12.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	26.01%	-7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	25.84%	-7.79%

QYLG vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLG vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.69%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLG and AIQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, QYLG and AIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QYLG or AIQ?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to QYLG (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLG dropped -29.98% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which ETF is better, QYLG or AIQ?

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 16.16% vs 12.12% for QYLG. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLG has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLG or AIQ?

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 16.16% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLG or AIQ?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLG or AIQ?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.69%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between QYLG and AIQ?

QYLG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIQ is Technology Equities. QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLG and 0.68% for AIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.