QYLD.L vs. SMH.L
QYLD.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and SMH.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while SMH.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLD.L returned 12.76%/yr vs 54.24%/yr for SMH.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD.L achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 76.50% return.
QYLD.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH.L
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- 6M
- 62.90%
- YTD
- 76.50%
- 1Y
- 124.23%
- 3Y*
- 54.24%
- 5Y*
- 35.65%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 7.25% | 5.36% | 24.77% | 23.25% | -2.11% |
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 76.50% | 49.20% | 24.11% | 75.94% | -5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD.L and SMH.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between QYLD.L and SMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD.L
SMH.L
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLD.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 8.88 | -4.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.18 | 27.77 | -9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD.L and SMH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -45.38% | +23.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -13.91% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | -36.25% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -11.91% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -11.12% | +8.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 4.46% | -3.42% |
Volatility
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLD.L) is 4.59%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 16.26%. This indicates that QYLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD.L | SMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 16.26% | -11.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 30.80% | -22.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 36.96% | -27.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 33.56% | -17.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 32.93% | -16.68% |
Dividends
QYLD.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison
QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, while SMH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 11.57% | 11.41% | 12.28% | 10.88% |
SMH.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. QYLD.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for QYLD.L and SMH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer