QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L
QYLD.L (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QYLD.L tracks the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite v2 UCITS Index while ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLD.L returned 11.90%/yr vs 22.88%/yr for ANXG.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QYLD.L is traded in USD, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD.L achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than ANXG.L's 12.52% return.
QYLD.L
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 17.51%
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.70% | 5.36% | 24.77% | 23.25% | -2.11% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 12.52% | 20.12% | 26.56% | 55.81% | -5.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD.L and ANXG.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between QYLD.L and ANXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD.L
ANXG.L
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.19 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 7.40 | +7.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum ANXG.L drawdown of -37.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD.L and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -37.77% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.68% | -11.02% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | -23.10% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -6.65% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -8.66% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 3.27% | -2.20% |
Volatility
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L) is 5.08%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that QYLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.55% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 13.53% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.99% | 17.21% | -7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 20.74% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 22.37% | -6.08% |
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, while ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.85% | 11.41% | 12.28% | 10.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QYLD.L.
QYLD.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite v2 UCITS Index, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QYLD.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for QYLD.L and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer