PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXQ vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QXQ vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXQ achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.


QXQ

1D
-2.94%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
16.17%
6M
15.07%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXQ vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QXQ
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF
16.17%19.78%9.70%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.94%5.66%3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QXQ and IBID is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXQ vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXQ
QXQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXQ vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXQIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.72

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

7.20

-4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

29.14

-17.47

QXQ vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXQ and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXQ vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXQ drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXQ and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXQIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-1.28%

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-0.55%

-11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-0.55%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-0.22%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

0.13%

+3.03%

Volatility

QXQ vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that QXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXQIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

0.35%

+8.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

0.86%

+13.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

1.23%

+16.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

2.24%

+19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.15%

2.24%

+19.91%

QXQ vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QXQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QXQ vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

QXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
QXQ
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF
15.41%18.21%1.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXQ and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QXQ has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXQ dropped -22.53% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, QXQ leads with 36.80% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QXQ has performed better with a 36.80% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QXQ.

QXQ has the higher dividend yield at 15.41%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

QXQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QXQ and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXQ and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer