PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXO vs. SMTGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QXO vs. SMTGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QXO, Inc (QXO) and SMA Solar Technology AG (SMTGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXO achieves a -14.77% return, which is significantly lower than SMTGY's 88.17% return.


QXO

1D
0.74%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-14.77%
6M
-17.80%
1Y
-1.20%
3Y*
-6.04%
5Y*
-18.47%
10Y*
7.71%

SMTGY

1D
4.22%
1M
19.91%
YTD
88.17%
6M
87.48%
1Y
268.67%
3Y*
-10.00%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXO vs. SMTGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QXO
QXO, Inc
-14.77%21.32%-86.06%508.46%-33.78%63.72%0.16%
SMTGY
SMA Solar Technology AG
88.17%201.14%-78.32%-10.78%69.47%-36.69%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QXO and SMTGY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QXO:

$122.38M

SMTGY:

$2.65B

EPS

QXO:

-$1.03

SMTGY:

-$0.52

PS Ratio

QXO:

0.96

SMTGY:

1.73

PB Ratio

QXO:

0.01

SMTGY:

7.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

QXO:

$8.56B

SMTGY:

$1.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QXO:

$1.98B

SMTGY:

$128.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

QXO:

-$152.95M

SMTGY:

-$42.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXO vs. SMTGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXO
QXO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SMTGY
SMTGY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMTGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTGY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTGY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXO vs. SMTGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QXO, Inc (QXO) and SMA Solar Technology AG (SMTGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QXOSMTGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

3.42

-3.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

3.32

-2.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.56

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

7.47

-7.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.06

23.45

-23.52

QXO vs. SMTGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXO Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the SMTGY Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXO and SMTGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QXOSMTGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

3.42

-3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.10

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.10

-0.05

Drawdowns

QXO vs. SMTGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXO drawdown since its inception was -95.44%, which is greater than SMTGY's maximum drawdown of -89.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXO and SMTGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXOSMTGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.44%

-89.48%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.08%

-36.24%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.44%

-89.29%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.44%

-89.48%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.02%

-35.08%

-57.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.34%

-48.27%

-8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.82%

11.51%

+8.31%

Volatility

QXO vs. SMTGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QXO, Inc (QXO) is 16.10%, while SMA Solar Technology AG (SMTGY) has a volatility of 22.81%. This indicates that QXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMTGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXOSMTGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.10%

22.81%

-6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.44%

47.66%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.14%

79.32%

-19.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.36%

74.36%

+71.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.57%

85.91%

+37.66%

Dividends

QXO vs. SMTGY - Dividend Comparison

Neither QXO nor SMTGY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QXO
QXO, Inc
0.00%0.00%164.53%1.17%0.00%13.42%31.47%1.15%0.00%1.89%2.00%
SMTGY
SMA Solar Technology AG
0.00%0.00%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QXO vs. SMTGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QXO, Inc and SMA Solar Technology AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.73B
346.53M
(QXO) Total Revenue
(SMTGY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QXO vs. SMTGY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QXO, Inc and SMA Solar Technology AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
23.7%
25.4%
Portfolio components
QXO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a gross profit of 409.30M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.

SMTGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SMA Solar Technology AG reported a gross profit of 87.89M and revenue of 346.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

QXO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported an operating income of -251.90M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.

SMTGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SMA Solar Technology AG reported an operating income of 15.24M and revenue of 346.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

QXO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a net income of -227.10M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.

SMTGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SMA Solar Technology AG reported a net income of -1.65M and revenue of 346.53M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QXO and SMTGY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTGY has higher volatility (22.81%) compared to QXO (16.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXO dropped -95.44% vs SMTGY's -89.48%.

SMTGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXO and SMTGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer