PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than HVOI.TO's 11.41% return.


QXM.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
2.02%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
10.29%

HVOI.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
2.69%
6M
9.70%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and HVOI.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HVOI.TO
HVOI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXM.TOHVOI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.98

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

11.93

-3.96

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and HVOI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, which is greater than HVOI.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and HVOI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXM.TOHVOI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-6.72%

-33.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-6.72%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.89%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.67%

+0.88%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) at 2.06%. This indicates that QXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HVOI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXM.TOHVOI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

2.06%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

7.06%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

8.70%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

8.31%

+5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

8.31%

+7.40%

Dividends

QXM.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than HVOI.TO's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HVOI.TO
Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A
6.63%4.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXM.TO and HVOI.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and Harvest.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and HVOI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer