PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than BTCX-B.TO's -25.01% return.


QXM.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.52%
6M
2.20%
YTD
5.90%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
10.22%
ALL TIME*
12.05%

BTCX-B.TO

1D
-0.60%
1M
6.21%
6M
-26.36%
YTD
-25.01%
1Y
-44.75%
3Y*
32.09%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.06MCA$1.35MCA$1.75M
CA$10.54KCA$11.00KCA$13.52K

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
5.90%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%8.32%
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-25.01%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-18.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and BTCX-B.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.83

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

-0.85

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

-1.30

+8.82

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and BTCX-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown of -75.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and BTCX-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-75.26%

+34.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-52.71%

+43.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-52.71%

+36.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-75.26%

+52.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-48.65%

+47.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-33.37%

+29.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

34.56%

-32.01%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) is 5.94%, while CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that QXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCX-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXM.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

9.14%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

33.74%

-21.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

43.73%

-29.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.00%

53.25%

-39.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

54.59%

-38.87%

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QXM.TO has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCX-B.TO's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

QXM.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXM.TO and BTCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QXM.TO is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

QXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while BTCX-B.TO is Cryptocurrency. QXM.TO tracks Morningstar National Bank Québec Index, while BTCX-B.TO tracks No Index (Physical Bitcoin). Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QXM.TO and 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and BTCX-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer