PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QWTM.L is traded in GBp, while ITEC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ITEC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QWTM.L having a 51.52% return and ITEC.L slightly lower at 49.74%.


QWTM.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
20.99%
YTD
51.52%
6M
41.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITEC.L

1D
0.24%
1M
20.74%
YTD
49.74%
6M
46.16%
1Y
63.94%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
17.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QWTM.L and ITEC.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QWTM.L

ITEC.L
ITEC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ITEC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QWTM.LITEC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.11

0.70

+2.42

Drawdowns

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum ITEC.L drawdown of -37.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and ITEC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QWTM.LITEC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-37.70%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

0.00%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-8.32%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

Volatility

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QWTM.LITEC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.18%

25.02%

+14.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.18%

25.40%

+13.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.18%

23.87%

+15.31%

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QWTM.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITEC.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

QWTM.L vs. ITEC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QWTM.L nor ITEC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QWTM.L and ITEC.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITEC.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITEC.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.

QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while ITEC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QWTM.L and 0.18% for ITEC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and ITEC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer