QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and GBSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - QWTM.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while GBSP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QWTM.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GBSP.L.

Performance

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than GBSP.L's 3.18% return.

QWTM.L

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 17.19%
• YTD: 51.52%
• 6M: 41.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBSP.L

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -4.73%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 31.89%
• 3Y*: 30.23%
• 5Y*: 17.19%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc	51.52%	19.86%
GBSP.L WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged	3.18%	20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QWTM.L and GBSP.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSP.L

GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QWTM.L	GBSP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.11	0.38	+2.73

Drawdowns

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum GBSP.L drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and GBSP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QWTM.L	GBSP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.74%	-37.30%	+13.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.05%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-15.96%	+11.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.21%	-17.52%	+7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QWTM.L	GBSP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	24.78%	+14.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.18%	17.29%	+21.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.18%	15.56%	+23.62%

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QWTM.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GBSP.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QWTM.L vs. GBSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither QWTM.L nor GBSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QWTM.L and GBSP.L in my portfolio?

QWTM.L and GBSP.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QWTM.L or GBSP.L?

On fees, GBSP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QWTM.L or GBSP.L?

GBSP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.

What is the main difference between QWTM.L and GBSP.L?

QWTM.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while GBSP.L is Precious Metals. QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QWTM.L and 0.25% for GBSP.L.