QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L
QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and FSKY.L (First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both Technology Equities funds - QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index while FSKY.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QWTM.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FSKY.L.
Performance
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than FSKY.L's 13.94% return.
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- 51.52%
- 6M
- 41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSKY.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 15.87%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 51.52% | 19.86% |
FSKY.L First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 13.94% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWTM.L and FSKY.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L — Risk / Return Rank
QWTM.L
FSKY.L
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QWTM.L | FSKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.11 | 0.57 | +2.54 |
Drawdowns
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum FSKY.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and FSKY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWTM.L | FSKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -47.61% | +23.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -2.97% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -15.61% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.10% | — |
Volatility
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWTM.L | FSKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.18% | 27.67% | +11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 28.23% | +10.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 27.47% | +11.71% |
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWTM.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSKY.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QWTM.L vs. FSKY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QWTM.L nor FSKY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QWTM.L and FSKY.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QWTM.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QWTM.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSKY.L.
QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while FSKY.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QWTM.L and 0.60% for FSKY.L.
Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and FSKY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer