QWTM.L vs. FDN.L
QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and FDN.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index while FDN.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QWTM.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FDN.L.
Performance
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWTM.L achieves a 51.52% return, which is significantly higher than FDN.L's 4.53% return.
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- 51.52%
- 6M
- 41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDN.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 51.52% | 19.86% |
FDN.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD | 4.53% | -2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWTM.L and FDN.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L — Risk / Return Rank
QWTM.L
FDN.L
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QWTM.L | FDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.11 | 0.35 | +2.76 |
Drawdowns
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWTM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum FDN.L drawdown of -46.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWTM.L and FDN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWTM.L | FDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -46.90% | +23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -2.70% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -14.80% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.07% | — |
Volatility
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWTM.L | FDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.18% | 18.40% | +20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 24.41% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 24.51% | +14.67% |
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWTM.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FDN.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QWTM.L vs. FDN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QWTM.L nor FDN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QWTM.L and FDN.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QWTM.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QWTM.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDN.L.
QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index, while FDN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QWTM.L and 0.55% for FDN.L.
Find the right allocation for QWTM.L and FDN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer