PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMT vs. URSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMT vs. URSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly lower than URSP's 22.76% return.


QVMT

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.65%
6M
11.45%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
12.55%
ALL TIME*
11.80%

URSP

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.25%
6M
15.52%
YTD
22.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$936.15K$987.45K$703.91K
$2.68M$2.91M$2.10M

QVMT vs. URSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QVMT and URSP is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMT vs. URSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVMT
QVMT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

URSP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVMT vs. URSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVMTURSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

QVMT vs. URSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVMT vs. URSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, which is greater than URSP's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and URSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMTURSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.05%

-15.72%

-32.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-2.52%

-4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-2.89%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

Volatility

QVMT vs. URSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMTURSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

23.34%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

23.34%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

23.34%

-2.12%

QVMT vs. URSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than URSP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVMT vs. URSP - Dividend Comparison

QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than URSP's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVMT
Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF
1.90%2.42%2.71%3.05%2.49%2.31%2.70%2.23%2.48%2.37%1.11%0.54%
URSP
ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
0.91%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMT and URSP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URSP.

QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.91% for URSP.

QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while URSP is Leveraged Equities. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while URSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.95% for URSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMT and URSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer