QVMT vs. IGM
QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVMT returned 12.93%/yr vs 24.07%/yr for IGM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
QVMT vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 17.80% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QVMT has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 12.93%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.07% annualized return.
QVMT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
IGM
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 19.94%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 1Y
- 40.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 24.07%
QVMT vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 17.80% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 18.77% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.51% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and IGM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.44 |
The correlation between QVMT and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
IGM
QVMT vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVMT | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.75 | 2.50 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 7.94 | +8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -65.59% | +17.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -16.44% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -26.39% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -40.68% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | -40.68% | -7.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -7.49% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -15.19% | +8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 5.16% | -3.29% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is 7.79%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that QVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 9.89% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 19.55% | -8.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 23.45% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 26.21% | -8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 24.75% | -3.57% |
QVMT vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMT vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 1.85% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMT and IGM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to QVMT (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.07% vs 12.93% for QVMT. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QVMT has been the lower-risk option at 7.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while IGM is Technology Equities. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.39% for IGM.
QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMT and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer