PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMT vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMT vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.15% return. Over the past 10 years, QVMT has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 12.79%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.


QVMT

1D
-1.55%
1M
1.85%
YTD
16.07%
6M
18.74%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.79%

DBO

1D
-2.05%
1M
1.22%
YTD
76.15%
6M
69.63%
1Y
72.26%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMT vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVMT
Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF
16.07%19.08%14.40%11.71%-5.61%35.27%-9.98%28.86%-9.51%18.77%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.15%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMT and DBO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.25

The correlation between QVMT and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMT vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMT
QVMT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMT vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMTDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

3.99

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.73

8.09

+11.64

QVMT vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMT and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMTDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.10

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.46

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.33

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.01

+0.57

Drawdowns

QVMT vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMTDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.05%

-90.18%

+42.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

-18.19%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-28.20%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-37.68%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.05%

-61.69%

+13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-53.65%

+52.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-62.25%

+55.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

8.96%

-7.20%

Volatility

QVMT vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is 3.36%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that QVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMTDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

11.00%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

28.43%

-19.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

34.63%

-22.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

32.31%

-15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

31.79%

-10.74%

QVMT vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVMT vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVMT
Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF
2.07%2.42%2.71%3.05%2.49%2.31%2.70%2.23%2.48%2.37%1.11%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMT and DBO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to QVMT (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, QVMT leads with 12.79% vs 10.48% for DBO. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QVMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVMT has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while DBO is Oil & Gas. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.78% for DBO.

QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMT and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer