QVMT vs. DBO
QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVMT returned 12.79%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for DBO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
QVMT vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.15% return. Over the past 10 years, QVMT has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 12.79%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.
QVMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
DBO
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 76.15%
- 6M
- 69.63%
- 1Y
- 72.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
QVMT vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 16.07% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 18.77% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 76.15% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and DBO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.25 |
The correlation between QVMT and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
DBO
QVMT vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 3.99 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.73 | 8.09 | +11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.10 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.33 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.01 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -90.18% | +42.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -18.19% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -28.20% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -37.68% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | -61.69% | +13.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -53.65% | +52.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -62.25% | +55.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 8.96% | -7.20% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is 3.36%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that QVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 11.00% | -7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 28.43% | -19.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 34.63% | -22.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 32.31% | -15.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 31.79% | -10.74% |
QVMT vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMT vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.99% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 2.07% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMT and DBO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to QVMT (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, QVMT leads with 12.79% vs 10.48% for DBO. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QVMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QVMT has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.
QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while DBO is Oil & Gas. QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.78% for DBO.
QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMT and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer