QVCGA vs. SES

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) and SES (SES AI Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — QVCGA in Internet Retail, SES in Auto Parts.

Performance

QVCGA vs. SES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QVC Group Inc (QVCGA) and SES AI Corp (SES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SES

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -40.56%
• 6M: -47.55%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: -20.00%
• 5Y*: -36.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVCGA vs. SES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%
SES SES AI Corp	-15.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QVCGA : $2.75M SES : $356.14M
EPS QVCGA : -$302.09 SES : -$0.22
PS Ratio QVCGA : 0.00 SES : 16.19
Total Revenue (TTM) QVCGA : $9.23B SES : $21.92M
Gross Profit (TTM) QVCGA : $2.89B SES : $7.97M
EBITDA (TTM) QVCGA : $789.00M SES : -$68.11M

Return for Risk

QVCGA vs. SES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SES

SES Risk / Return Rank: 48
SES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SES Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SES Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SES Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SES Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVCGA vs. SES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QVC Group Inc (QVCGA) and SES AI Corp (SES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVCGA	SES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.17	—

Drawdowns

QVCGA vs. SES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVCGA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SES drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVCGA and SES.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVCGA	SES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-97.58%	+97.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-74.08%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-91.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-90.39%	+90.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-65.76%	+65.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QVCGA	SES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	76.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	106.91%	-106.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	114.53%	-114.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	111.41%	-111.41%

Dividends

QVCGA vs. SES - Dividend Comparison

Neither QVCGA nor SES has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials