QVCGA vs. ASST

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) and ASST (Strive, Inc.) are both stocks. QVCGA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ASST operates in Asset Management (Financial Services).

Performance

QVCGA vs. ASST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QVC Group Inc (QVCGA) and Strive, Inc. (ASST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ASST

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: -16.90%
• 6M: -34.92%
• YTD: -16.40%
• 1Y: -86.35%
• 3Y*: -53.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -67.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVCGA vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%
ASST Strive, Inc.	-30.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QVCGA : $2.69M ASST : $1.22B
EPS QVCGA : -$301.98 ASST : -$19.16
PS Ratio QVCGA : 0.00 ASST : 77.49
Total Revenue (TTM) QVCGA : $9.23B ASST : $5.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) QVCGA : $2.89B ASST : -$7.43M
EBITDA (TTM) QVCGA : $789.00M ASST : -$304.63M

Return for Risk

QVCGA vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASST

ASST Risk / Return Rank: 16
ASST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ASST Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ASST Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ASST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ASST Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVCGA vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QVC Group Inc (QVCGA) and Strive, Inc. (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVCGA	ASST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.90	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.05	—

Drawdowns

QVCGA vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVCGA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVCGA and ASST.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVCGA	ASST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-98.78%	+98.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-95.98%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-97.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.90%	+97.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-90.60%	+90.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	82.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QVCGA	ASST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	25.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	76.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	147.69%	-147.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	318.38%	-318.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	318.38%	-318.38%

Dividends

QVCGA vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison

Neither QVCGA nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials