PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QUU.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QUU.TO having a 13.03% return and XUU-U.TO slightly higher at 13.11%.


QUU.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
6.93%
YTD
13.03%
6M
11.12%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*

XUU-U.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
7.20%
YTD
13.11%
6M
10.82%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
13.03%13.08%35.77%25.01%-15.10%26.45%18.85%6.55%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
13.11%11.00%33.03%23.73%-14.72%26.98%16.71%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.37

Over the past year, QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUU.TO
QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUU.TOXUU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.61

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.05

13.77

-0.71

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUU.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.60

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.98

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.97

-0.05

Drawdowns

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUU.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-24.77%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-8.58%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-20.06%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-22.68%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-4.88%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.25%

+0.11%

Volatility

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 2.72%. This indicates that QUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUU.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.72%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

9.17%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

11.90%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

16.25%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.35%

-0.06%

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than XUU-U.TO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
0.88%0.97%1.00%1.21%1.59%0.98%1.34%1.59%1.55%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.83%0.76%0.85%1.01%0.77%0.90%0.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.

QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for QUU.TO and 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and XUU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer