PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than XUSC.TO's 13.63% return.


QUU.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
12.05%
6M
11.16%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*

XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
2.43%
YTD
13.63%
6M
12.62%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
12.05%13.08%11.24%
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
13.63%11.40%10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QUU.TO and XUSC.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

0.91

The correlation between QUU.TO and XUSC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUU.TO
QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUU.TOXUSC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.47

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

12.60

-1.49

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUU.TO and XUSC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than XUSC.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and XUSC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUU.TOXUSC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-18.31%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-7.60%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.95%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-2.64%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.09%

+0.31%

Volatility

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) at 4.06%. This indicates that QUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUU.TOXUSC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.06%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

9.16%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

11.89%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

15.73%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

15.73%

+1.55%

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUU.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSC.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUU.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than XUSC.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
0.89%0.97%1.00%1.21%1.59%0.98%1.34%1.59%1.55%
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.83%0.94%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QUU.TO and XUSC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for QUU.TO and 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and XUSC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer