PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUSC.TO is traded in CAD, while XUS-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUS-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSC.TO achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than XUS-U.TO's 11.92% return.


XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUS-U.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
7.46%
YTD
11.92%
6M
10.34%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
12.69%11.40%11.76%
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
11.92%12.26%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.87

The correlation between XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XUS-U.TO
XUS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSC.TOXUS-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.31

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

13.10

+0.31

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the XUS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSC.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.44

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.00

+0.27

Drawdowns

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSC.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-27.29%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-8.95%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-4.57%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.25%

-0.18%

Volatility

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) is 2.61%, while iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that XUSC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSC.TOXUS-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.79%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

9.13%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

12.13%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.96%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.10%

-1.38%

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSC.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XUS-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUSC.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than XUS-U.TO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XUS-U.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF
0.82%0.91%0.74%0.90%1.04%0.71%0.91%0.04%
XUSC.TO
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.84%0.94%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

XUSC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XUS-U.TO is S&P 500. XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while XUS-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUSC.TO and 0.09% for XUS-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSC.TO and XUS-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer