QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO
QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) and HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUU.TO returned 16.35%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for HXT.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than HXT.TO's 9.45% return.
QUU.TO
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- —
HXT.TO
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 10.24% | 13.08% | 35.77% | 25.01% | -15.10% | 26.45% | 18.85% | 24.81% | -1.07% |
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 9.45% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUU.TO and HXT.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between QUU.TO and HXT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Communication Services
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Financial Services
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Healthcare
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
-
Industrials
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Consumer Defensive
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Energy
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Utilities
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Basic Materials
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Real Estate
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QUU.TO
HXT.TO
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUU.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.10 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 19.03 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUU.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.65 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.26 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -52.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and HXT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUU.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -52.13% | +25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -7.71% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -12.36% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.00% | -16.33% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -1.77% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -19.09% | +14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.66% | +0.71% |
Volatility
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 3.91%. This indicates that QUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUU.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 3.91% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 9.58% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 11.91% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 12.79% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 15.17% | +2.12% |
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QUU.TO and HXT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUU.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison
QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.98% | 1.34% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUU.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUU.TO and HXT.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
QUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and HXT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer