QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE
QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QUTM.DE tracks the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR) while XMOV.DE tracks the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QUTM.DE returned 59.20% vs 51.46% for XMOV.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUTM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMOV.DE.
Performance
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than XMOV.DE's 27.31% return.
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 59.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMOV.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 51.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 33.86% | 14.59% |
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF | 27.31% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUTM.DE and XMOV.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between QUTM.DE and XMOV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QUTM.DE
XMOV.DE
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUTM.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 4.71 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | 17.12 | -11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUTM.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.57 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.76 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum XMOV.DE drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and XMOV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUTM.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -34.78% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.74% | -10.87% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -2.17% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -7.53% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.15% | 3.00% | +7.15% |
Volatility
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) at 8.84%. This indicates that QUTM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMOV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUTM.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 8.84% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.92% | 15.94% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.14% | 19.94% | +10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.16% | 19.34% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.16% | 20.77% | +9.39% |
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XMOV.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUTM.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUTM.DE nor XMOV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUTM.DE and XMOV.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMOV.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMOV.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.35% for XMOV.DE.
Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and XMOV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer