PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 23.86% return, which is significantly lower than V0IH.DE's 35.71% return.


QUTM.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
23.86%
6M
22.33%
1Y
49.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

V0IH.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.74%
YTD
35.71%
6M
37.62%
1Y
69.95%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QUTM.DE
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc
23.86%14.27%
V0IH.DE
VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A
35.71%31.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QUTM.DE and V0IH.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

V0IH.DE
V0IH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
V0IH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUTM.DEV0IH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

4.37

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

15.84

-11.05

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the V0IH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUTM.DE and V0IH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum V0IH.DE drawdown of -44.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and V0IH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUTM.DEV0IH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.77%

-44.39%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.77%

-16.07%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.10%

-16.07%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-15.66%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

4.43%

+5.86%

Volatility

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) at 9.41%. This indicates that QUTM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V0IH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUTM.DEV0IH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.75%

9.41%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.53%

21.35%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.64%

29.57%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.19%

30.55%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.19%

30.55%

+2.64%

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than V0IH.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUTM.DE vs. V0IH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUTM.DE nor V0IH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUTM.DE and V0IH.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V0IH.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V0IH.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

QUTM.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while V0IH.DE is Energy Equities. QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.35% for V0IH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and V0IH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer