QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QUTM.DE returned 55.17% vs 23.16% for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUTM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 26.79% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's -2.63% return.
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 26.44%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 26.79% | 14.27% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUTM.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QUTM.DE
4GLD.DE
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUTM.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 1.12 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 3.41 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUTM.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -36.79% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -21.73% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -19.44% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -12.03% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.14% | 7.11% | +3.03% |
Volatility
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 6.93%. This indicates that QUTM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUTM.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 6.93% | +7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.16% | 20.81% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.44% | 23.70% | +9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 16.29% | +16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 14.56% | +18.50% |
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUTM.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUTM.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUTM.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
QUTM.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer