QUSA vs. SIOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) and SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. QUSA is actively managed, while SIOO is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUSA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SIOO.

Performance

QUSA vs. SIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUSA achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than SIOO's 6.57% return.

QUSA

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.95%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIOO

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUSA vs. SIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	10.15%	-0.22%
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	6.57%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QUSA and SIOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

QUSA vs. SIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUSA

QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 14
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUSA vs. SIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QUSA	SIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUSA	SIOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.59	-0.98

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. SIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, which is greater than SIOO's maximum drawdown of -6.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and SIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUSA	SIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-6.86%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.21%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-1.01%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUSA	SIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.35%	10.33%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.33%	10.33%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.33%	10.33%	0.00%

QUSA vs. SIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUSA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SIOO's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUSA vs. SIOO - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.43%, more than SIOO's 7.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	12.43%	6.61%
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	7.42%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUSA and SIOO in my portfolio?

QUSA and SIOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUSA or SIOO?

On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUSA or SIOO?

SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUSA or SIOO?

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 12.43%, compared with 7.42% for SIOO.

What is the main difference between QUSA and SIOO?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QUSA and 0.59% for SIOO.