PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUSA vs. BTYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUSA vs. BTYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QUSA

1D
0.03%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.83%
6M
9.97%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTYB

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUSA vs. BTYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QUSA and BTYB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUSA vs. BTYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUSA
QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BTYB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUSA vs. BTYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUSABTYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.89

QUSA vs. BTYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUSABTYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.81

+1.38

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. BTYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, which is greater than BTYB's maximum drawdown of -3.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and BTYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUSABTYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-3.99%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.99%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-0.98%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

Volatility

QUSA vs. BTYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUSABTYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

8.71%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.35%

8.71%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

8.71%

+1.64%

QUSA vs. BTYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUSA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTYB's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUSA vs. BTYB - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, more than BTYB's 2.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QUSA and BTYB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 12.47%, compared with 2.70% for BTYB.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QUSA and 0.52% for BTYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUSA and BTYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer