PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

QUS.AX (BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUS.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while NDQ.AX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUS.AX returned 11.02%/yr vs 21.65%/yr for NDQ.AX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS.AX achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than NDQ.AX's 10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, QUS.AX has underperformed NDQ.AX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while NDQ.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.65% annualized return.

QUS.AX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.18%
6M
3.68%
YTD
5.22%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
11.02%

NDQ.AX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.46%
6M
9.73%
YTD
10.94%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUS.AX
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		5.22%4.12%21.90%11.82%-5.88%37.47%-3.71%28.14%-0.86%7.24%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		10.94%11.35%38.19%53.22%-28.42%35.46%34.50%39.66%8.97%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between QUS.AX and NDQ.AX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2015

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between QUS.AX and NDQ.AX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Often compared with NDQ.AX:
NDQ.AX vs. IVVNDQ.AX vs. QQQNDQ.AX vs. IOONDQ.AX vs. BTC-USDNDQ.AX vs. SCHGNDQ.AX vs. TQQQNDQ.AX vs. JPM

Return for Risk

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QUS.AX
QUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QUS.AXNDQ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.89
1.31

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.30
1.82

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.72

3.30

-0.58

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS.AX and NDQ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS.AX drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, roughly equal to the maximum NDQ.AX drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS.AX and NDQ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUS.AXNDQ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-30.79%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-15.17%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-21.27%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-30.79%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.54%

-30.79%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-3.79%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-5.85%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

6.08%

-2.51%

Volatility

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX) is 3.06%, while BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that QUS.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDQ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUS.AXNDQ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

5.30%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

11.69%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

15.12%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

19.15%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

19.15%

-4.32%

Dividends

QUS.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Dividend Comparison

QUS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than NDQ.AX's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		1.47%0.93%1.81%2.09%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.37%0.25%0.40%0.00%
QUS.AX
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		1.98%2.10%2.33%2.28%3.29%1.85%12.79%4.07%2.57%1.47%2.58%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

QUS.AX and NDQ.AX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUS.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while NDQ.AX is Nasdaq-100. QUS.AX tracks BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUS.AX and NDQ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer