PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QULL vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QULL vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QULL vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
-8.08%17.61%-6.08%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a -8.08% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.


QULL

1D
6.13%
1M
-12.81%
YTD
-8.08%
6M
-4.77%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QULL vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QULL vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QULL
QULL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QULL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
QULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QULL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QULL vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QULLTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.32

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

1.26

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.97

1.27

+2.70

QULL vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QULL Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QULL and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QULLTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.32

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.44

+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between QULL and TSLG is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QULL vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.


Drawdowns

QULL vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QULLTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.83%

-82.86%

+31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.81%

-50.92%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.42%

-67.59%

+54.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-58.04%

+43.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

23.82%

-18.55%

Volatility

QULL vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 11.40%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QULLTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

22.28%

-10.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.77%

59.35%

-39.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

110.61%

-73.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.65%

119.00%

-83.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.50%

119.00%

-83.50%