QULL vs. HDLB
QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) are both Leveraged Equities funds from UBS - QULL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index while HDLB tracks the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QULL returned 16.15%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for HDLB. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for HDLB.
Performance
QULL vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than HDLB's 9.69% return.
QULL
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
HDLB
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
QULL vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 14.81% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -42.00% | 51.36% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 9.69% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 42.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and HDLB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QULL and HDLB has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QULL vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank
QULL
HDLB
QULL vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QULL | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.23 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 2.69 | +6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QULL | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.68 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.37 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.10 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
QULL vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and HDLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QULL | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -78.70% | +26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.43% | -14.50% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -22.46% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -43.81% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -14.15% | +13.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -27.47% | +13.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 6.62% | -2.47% |
Volatility
QULL vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 4.68%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QULL | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 6.21% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.79% | 18.14% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 26.46% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.62% | 30.55% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 43.58% | -8.43% |
QULL vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QULL vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 12.13% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QULL and HDLB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDLB has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to QULL (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs HDLB's -78.70%.
On 5-year performance, QULL leads with 16.15% vs 11.24% for HDLB. On fees, QULL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QULL has performed better with a 16.15% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QULL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.
QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 1.65% for HDLB.
QULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QULL and HDLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer