QULL vs. GGLL
QULL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - QULL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index while GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QULL returned 32.28%/yr vs 65.97%/yr for GGLL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GGLL.
Performance
QULL vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 22.24% return.
QULL
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
GGLL
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 293.20%
- 3Y*
- 65.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QULL vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 14.81% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -5.88% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 22.24% | 123.07% | 48.88% | 81.20% | -30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and GGLL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QULL and GGLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QULL vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank
QULL
GGLL
QULL vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QULL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.60 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 7.69 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 26.53 | -17.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QULL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 5.07 | -3.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.99 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
QULL vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, roughly equal to the maximum GGLL drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and GGLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QULL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -52.81% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.43% | -38.39% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -52.81% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -21.02% | +20.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -15.17% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 11.11% | -6.96% |
Volatility
QULL vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 4.68%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QULL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 16.60% | -11.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.79% | 40.70% | -21.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 58.40% | -33.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.62% | 56.03% | -20.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 56.03% | -20.88% |
QULL vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QULL vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 3.73% | 4.16% | 3.29% | 2.05% | 0.59% |
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QULL and GGLL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to QULL (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QULL dropped -51.83% vs GGLL's -52.81%.
On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 65.97% vs 32.28% for QULL. On fees, QULL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QULL has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 65.97% return vs 32.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QULL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.
GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.00% for QULL.
QULL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QULL and 1.05% for GGLL.
GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QULL and GGLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer