QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QUEJ.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and EMWE.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - QUEJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while EMWE.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QUEJ.DE returned 2.69%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for EMWE.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUEJ.DE achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than EMWE.DE's 9.24% return.

QUEJ.DE

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 2.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMWE.DE

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: 10.15%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc	7.21%	3.79%	1.15%	8.13%	-12.67%
EMWE.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc	9.24%	0.19%	15.43%	14.90%	-9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022	0.56

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUEJ.DE

QUEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 21
QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QUEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QUEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QUEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
QUEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

EMWE.DE

EMWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
EMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EMWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
EMWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EMWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EMWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QUEJ.DE	EMWE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.19	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	1.72	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	1.69	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	6.10	-3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the EMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUEJ.DE	EMWE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	1.19	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.70	-0.60

Drawdowns

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum EMWE.DE drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUEJ.DE	EMWE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.02%	-31.05%	+16.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-8.26%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.94%	-20.00%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	0.00%	-2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-5.28%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	2.29%	+1.31%

Volatility

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE) at 2.93%. This indicates that QUEJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMWE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QUEJ.DE	EMWE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	2.93%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.72%	8.57%	+5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	11.74%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	14.46%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.36%	15.52%	-0.16%

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QUEJ.DE vs. EMWE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUEJ.DE nor EMWE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE in my portfolio?

QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUEJ.DE or EMWE.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUEJ.DE or EMWE.DE?

QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between QUEJ.DE and EMWE.DE?

QUEJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while EMWE.DE is Global Equities. QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while EMWE.DE tracks MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped.