PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMWE.DE vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMWE.DE is traded in EUR, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMWE.DE achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 11.97% return.


EMWE.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
5.73%
YTD
9.24%
6M
10.02%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*

URTH

1D
0.36%
1M
5.08%
YTD
11.97%
6M
11.62%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMWE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
9.24%0.19%15.43%14.90%-16.11%38.30%11.27%31.39%-5.44%4.98%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
11.97%6.96%26.49%20.23%-12.88%31.42%6.24%31.04%-4.27%4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EMWE.DE and URTH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.57

The correlation between EMWE.DE and URTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMWE.DE vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMWE.DE
EMWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EMWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMWE.DEURTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.74

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

15.35

-9.25

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMWE.DE and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMWE.DEURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.08

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.75

-0.05

Drawdowns

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum URTH drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMWE.DE and URTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMWE.DEURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-33.45%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-6.56%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-20.94%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.79%

-20.94%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-4.11%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.59%

+0.70%

Volatility

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EMWE.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 2.51%. This indicates that EMWE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMWE.DEURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.51%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

8.59%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

11.77%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

15.37%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

17.21%

-1.69%

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMWE.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMWE.DE vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

EMWE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMWE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.34%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMWE.DE and URTH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EMWE.DE.

EMWE.DE tracks MSCI World SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EMWE.DE and 0.24% for URTH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMWE.DE and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer