QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE
QUEJ.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds from BNP Paribas - QUEJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped while EJAP.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QUEJ.DE returned 2.69%/yr vs 15.41%/yr for EJAP.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QUEJ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EJAP.DE.
Performance
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUEJ.DE achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than EJAP.DE's 16.87% return.
QUEJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 11.63%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EJAP.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 30.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.21% | 3.79% | 1.15% | 8.13% | -12.67% |
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 16.87% | 11.73% | 14.53% | 16.88% | -8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUEJ.DE and EJAP.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QUEJ.DE and EJAP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QUEJ.DE
EJAP.DE
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUEJ.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.30 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.86 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 9.27 | -6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUEJ.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.56 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.49 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum EJAP.DE drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUEJ.DE and EJAP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUEJ.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -94.44% | +79.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -10.34% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -16.92% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -86.65% | +84.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -75.83% | +69.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.20% | +0.40% |
Volatility
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUEJ.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 3.42% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 15.03% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 19.03% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.64% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 34.09% | -18.73% |
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUEJ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EJAP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUEJ.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUEJ.DE nor EJAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUEJ.DE and EJAP.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EJAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EJAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.
QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QUEJ.DE and 0.15% for EJAP.DE.
Find the right allocation for QUEJ.DE and EJAP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer