QUBX vs. NTSD
QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
QUBX vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QUBX
- 1D
- -14.85%
- 1M
- -44.16%
- YTD
- -48.88%
- 6M
- -59.20%
- 1Y
- -91.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | 27.77% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBX and NTSD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBX vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
QUBX
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUBX vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBX vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -5.58% | -90.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.79% | -3.31% | -90.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -1.12% | -69.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.78% | — | — |
Volatility
QUBX vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.88% | 24.95% | +175.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 24.95% | +175.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 24.95% | +175.93% |
QUBX vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUBX vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBX nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBX and NTSD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.
QUBX and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for QUBX and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer