PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return.


QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and XT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.90

The correlation between QTUM and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTUM
XT

Technology

84.2%
43.5%

Industrials

9.0%
10.1%

Communication Services

5.3%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
7.9%

Healthcare

0.7%
23.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

QTUM
84.2%
XT
43.5%

Industrials

QTUM
9.0%
XT
10.1%

Communication Services

QTUM
5.3%
XT
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QTUM
0.8%
XT
7.9%

Healthcare

QTUM
0.7%
XT
23.4%

Basic Materials

QTUM

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

QTUM

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

QTUM

-

XT
0.3%

Financial Services

QTUM

-

XT
3.3%

Real Estate

QTUM

-

XT
0.0%

Utilities

QTUM

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTUMXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.65

2.89

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

3.83

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.48

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

4.41

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.69

18.51

+5.18

QTUM vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTUMXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

2.89

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.41

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.66

+0.42

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-34.41%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-10.45%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

-22.09%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-34.41%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.47%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-7.41%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.49%

+1.55%

Volatility

QTUM vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

4.85%

+4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

11.94%

+8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

15.99%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.56%

20.76%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

20.08%

+7.09%

QTUM vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and XT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 8.42% for XT. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.

QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.46% for XT.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer