QTUM vs. XT
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.15%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
QTUM vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
QTUM vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and XT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QTUM and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
XT
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
XT
Industrials
QTUM
XT
Communication Services
QTUM
XT
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
XT
Healthcare
QTUM
XT
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
XT
Energy
QTUM
-
XT
Financial Services
QTUM
-
XT
Real Estate
QTUM
-
XT
Utilities
QTUM
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
XT
QTUM vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.65 | 2.89 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.26 | 3.83 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.48 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 4.41 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | 18.51 | +5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 2.89 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.41 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.66 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -34.41% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -10.45% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -22.09% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -34.41% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.47% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -7.41% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.49% | +1.55% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 4.85% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 11.94% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 15.99% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 20.76% | +5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 20.08% | +7.09% |
QTUM vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and XT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 8.42% for XT. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.46% for XT.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer