QTUM vs. TSXU
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
QTUM vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 3.22% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and TSXU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
TSXU
QTUM vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.65 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.26 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 4.53 | -3.46 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -35.62% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.92% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -10.56% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility
QTUM vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 78.68% | -52.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 78.68% | -52.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 78.68% | -51.51% |
QTUM vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and TSXU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer