QTUM vs. SHLD
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTUM returned 80.80% vs 8.97% for SHLD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
QTUM vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 44.14% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.65% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 9.65% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.65% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and SHLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | 0.41 |
QTUM vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
SHLD
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTUM
SHLD
Industrials
QTUM
SHLD
Communication Services
QTUM
SHLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
SHLD
-
Healthcare
QTUM
SHLD
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Energy
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Financial Services
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Real Estate
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
SHLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
SHLD
QTUM vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.08 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | 0.45 | +4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.76 | 1.16 | +18.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 0.37 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.98 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -20.10% | -18.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -20.10% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -19.16% | +12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -3.26% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 7.78% | -3.68% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 7.64%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 7.64% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 19.39% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 24.20% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 21.14% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 21.14% | +6.20% |
QTUM vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and SHLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to SHLD (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs SHLD's -20.10%.
On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 80.80% vs 8.97% for SHLD. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 80.80% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.50% for SHLD.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer