QTUM vs. PTF
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.09%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for PTF. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
QTUM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.64% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
QTUM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | -23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and PTF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between QTUM and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
PTF
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTUM
PTF
Industrials
QTUM
PTF
Communication Services
QTUM
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
PTF
-
Healthcare
QTUM
PTF
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
PTF
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
PTF
-
Energy
QTUM
-
PTF
Financial Services
QTUM
-
PTF
Real Estate
QTUM
-
PTF
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
PTF
QTUM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.38 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 5.36 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 20.45 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -55.38% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -17.99% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -36.11% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -44.88% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -4.47% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -13.26% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 4.71% | -0.50% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 16.30% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | 31.97% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 40.36% | -11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 35.34% | -8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 33.16% | -5.76% |
QTUM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and PTF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 21.88% for PTF. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 21.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTF is Momentum. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.60% for PTF.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer