PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.64% return.


QTUM

1D
1.22%
1M
9.88%
YTD
47.39%
6M
45.72%
1Y
82.93%
3Y*
48.15%
5Y*
28.09%
10Y*

PTF

1D
1.49%
1M
6.00%
YTD
69.64%
6M
66.68%
1Y
95.99%
3Y*
39.34%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
26.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
47.39%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.44%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
69.64%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%-23.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and PTF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.82

The correlation between QTUM and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTUM
PTF

Technology

85.1%
92.9%

Industrials

8.7%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.9%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

1.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTUM
85.1%
PTF
92.9%

Industrials

QTUM
8.7%
PTF
1.8%

Communication Services

QTUM
4.9%
PTF
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QTUM
0.7%
PTF

-

Healthcare

QTUM
0.6%
PTF

-

Basic Materials

QTUM

-

PTF

-

Consumer Defensive

QTUM

-

PTF

-

Energy

QTUM

-

PTF
1.6%

Financial Services

QTUM

-

PTF
1.4%

Real Estate

QTUM

-

PTF

-

Utilities

QTUM

-

PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTUMPTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

5.36

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

20.45

-0.69

QTUM vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-55.38%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-17.99%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

-36.11%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-44.88%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-4.47%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-13.26%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.71%

-0.50%

Volatility

QTUM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.18%

16.30%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

31.97%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.39%

40.36%

-11.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.99%

35.34%

-8.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

33.16%

-5.76%

QTUM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.73%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and PTF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 21.88% for PTF. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 21.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTF is Momentum. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.60% for PTF.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer