QTUM vs. ORCL
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while ORCL (Oracle Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.09%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for ORCL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QTUM vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than ORCL's -4.95% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 86.28%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
ORCL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -13.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.60%
QTUM vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | -4.95% | 18.13% | 59.99% | 30.94% | -4.65% | 36.89% | 24.25% | 19.34% | -6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and ORCL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between QTUM and ORCL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
ORCL
QTUM vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.04 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | -0.12 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | -0.20 | +19.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum ORCL drawdown of -84.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and ORCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -84.19% | +45.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -58.25% | +42.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -58.25% | +32.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -58.25% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -43.48% | +39.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -29.11% | +20.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 35.41% | -31.20% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a volatility of 23.44%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | ORCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 23.44% | -9.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | 43.42% | -20.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 65.91% | -37.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 42.16% | -15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 35.12% | -7.72% |
Dividends
QTUM vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than ORCL's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORCL Oracle Corporation | 1.09% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.72% | 1.68% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 1.56% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and ORCL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ORCL has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs ORCL's -84.19%.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and ORCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer