QTUM vs. LUNR
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, QTUM returned 48.15%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QTUM vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | -1.82% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and LUNR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, QTUM and LUNR have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
LUNR
QTUM vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 3.47 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 7.12 | +12.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -97.43% | +58.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -41.94% | +26.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -78.54% | +53.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -67.53% | +63.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -63.21% | +54.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 20.37% | -16.16% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 42.95% | -28.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | 93.42% | -70.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 111.16% | -82.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 171.29% | -144.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 171.29% | -143.89% |
Dividends
QTUM vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and LUNR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer