QTUM vs. GPIX
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. QTUM is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, QTUM returned 94.08% vs 25.72% for GPIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
QTUM vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.56% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 10.28% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 53.56%
- 6M
- 53.19%
- 1Y
- 94.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 29.16%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.56% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 21.65% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 10.28% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and GPIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QTUM and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
GPIX
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
GPIX
Industrials
QTUM
GPIX
Communication Services
QTUM
GPIX
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
GPIX
Healthcare
QTUM
GPIX
Financial Services
QTUM
GPIX
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
GPIX
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
GPIX
Energy
QTUM
-
GPIX
Real Estate
QTUM
-
GPIX
Utilities
QTUM
-
GPIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
GPIX
QTUM vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.46 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.20 | 3.35 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.43 | 16.40 | +6.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -17.50% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -7.71% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.14% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -1.48% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 1.57% | +2.64% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.00%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 4.00% | +10.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.48% | 8.63% | +14.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 10.69% | +17.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 13.88% | +13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 13.88% | +13.55% |
QTUM vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than GPIX's 7.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 7.97% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and GPIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to GPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 94.08% vs 25.72% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 94.08% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.29% for GPIX.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer