PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. GOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 33.62% return, which is significantly higher than GOOX's 24.05% return.


QTUM

1D
3.36%
1M
-5.82%
6M
25.52%
YTD
33.62%
1Y
63.01%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
25.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.11%

GOOX

1D
8.51%
1M
6.14%
6M
3.76%
YTD
24.05%
1Y
213.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
71.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.21M$7.02M$7.62M
$54.81M$58.16M$111.60M

QTUM vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
33.62%36.65%53.02%
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
24.05%121.41%44.31%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and GOOX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTUM vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTUMGOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

5.52

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

14.22

-3.55

QTUM vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and GOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMGOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-52.46%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.51%

-39.00%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.35%

-17.55%

+4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-17.47%

+9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

15.11%

-9.19%

Volatility

QTUM vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 11.63%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 27.63%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMGOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

27.63%

-16.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.50%

49.57%

-23.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.77%

64.16%

-32.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

61.98%

-34.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.70%

61.98%

-34.28%

QTUM vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than GOOX's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.25%0.30%16.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.81%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and GOOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOX has higher volatility (27.63%) compared to QTUM (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 213.88% vs 63.01% for QTUM. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 213.88% return vs 63.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.25% for GOOX.

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 1.05% for GOOX.

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and GOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer